It seems the Chaim Rapoport review on The Rebbe: The Life and Afterlife of Menachem Mendel Schneerson has spurned a response from Heilman and Friedman. See the Seforim blog for links to all three documents, Rapoport’s review, Heilman and Friedman’s response and Rapoport’s rejoinder. I guess this goes to show the challenge of attempting to capture the life of great, controversial figure truly is.
Heilman and Friedman claim that many of those who have offered critiques of their work are doing so based on R. Rapoport’s review and not from having read the book itself. To reiterate points I made earlier, their book was disappointing because it seemed too speculative and that their speculations tended towards a preconceived conclusion. Now, it happens that R. Rapoport was better qualified to make various arguments about the book, but I did not need him to spell out the problems in order to come to the conclusion of being underwhelmed. Besides, it is clear that Heilman and Friedman have attempted to take on the wrong reviewer. One thing about R. Rapoport from his writings is his thoroughness in checking and presenting sources. It is almost encyclopedic. Just the fact he has written 72 pages of critique and says he has more for an updated draft should cause them to pause and reconsider.