Collective Immortality

In the first chapter of Celebrations of Life, Norman Cousins begins to define immortality as a collective, interdependent existence.  A person’s immortality is not defined as the self existing as self but rather as being part of greater humanity.  He argues that the soul is not the self but part of a collective existence as well. 

I began thinking about the concept that one has an element of the soul of someone greater than oneself.  If we take Cousins’ premise, then it makes sense, for each of us is the composite of humanity and as such has a piece of everyone’s “soul.”

A second aspect of this immortality is from the perspective of the Medieval concept of an active intellect.  Maimonides thus argues in his Guide for the Perplexed that individual divine providence and individual immortality is based on growth in knowledge, which allows one to connect this active intellect.  For Maimonides, it would be the ability to transcend the self to grasp the Divine world which would be the composite of all humanity.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s